2013/05/31 by C. M. Copperwheat, P. J. Wheatley, J. Southworth +8 · 2 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing #Astronomy #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Astrophysics #Exoplanet #Hot Jupiter #Light curve #Optics #Photometry (optics) #Physics #Planet #Planetary system #RADIUS #Rayleigh scattering #Scattering #Stars #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #Wavelength #astro-ph.EP
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1056
MNRAS accepted. Some minor revisions to the text in response to the reviewer's comments. 10 pages with 2 tables and 4 figures
arxiv created 2013/06/11 · openalex publication_date 2013/07/03 · arxiv updated 2015/06/16 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Transmission spectroscopy has been successfully used from both the ground and in space to characterize the atmospheres of transiting exoplanets. This technique is challenging from the ground because ground-based spectrographs tend not to be designed to be photometrically stable, and effects such as variable slit losses cause significant systematic uncertainties. An alternative approach is to use simultaneous photometric observations in multiple wavebands to determine wavelength-dependent transit depth differences. We report an application of this technique to one of the hottest known exoplanets, WASP-12b, using the triple-beam camera ULTRACAM. We obtained simultaneous light curves in Sloan u′, and two narrow-band filters centred on 4169 and 6010 Å, with full widths at half-maximum 52 and 118 Å, respectively. We fit these light curves with a photometric model and determine the planetary radius in the three different bands. Our data show no evidence for a difference in planetary radius over the wavelength range we study, and are consistent with an atmosphere that is dominated by Rayleigh scattering from a high-altitude haze, as well as more complicated atmosphere models which include the effects of molecules such as TiO. Our planetary radius measurements have an average precision of 2.6 per cent, compared to the ∼1.4–2.4 per cent radius differences predicted by the models over this wavelength range. We also find a consistent time of ingress and egress across our three wavebands, in contrast to the early ingress which has been reported for this system at shorter wavelengths.