2002/11/01 by Mick Smith · 2 citations
Environmental Science · Social Sciences · #Aesthetics #Artificiality #Capitalism #Civilization #Dialectic #Environmental Philosophy and Ethics #Environmental ethics #Epistemology #Geographies of human-animal interactions #Humanity #Ideology #Immorality #Innocence #Interpretation (philosophy) #Law #Modernity #Morality #Philosophy #Political science #Politics #Religion, Ecology, and Ethics #Sociology #State (computer science) #Theology
paper · doi:10.3197/096327102129341154
openalex publication_date 2002/11/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
The ‘state of nature’ could be understood in two senses; both in terms of its nature's current (sorry) condition and of that unmediated and pre-contractual relation between humanity and the environment posited by political philosophers like Locke and Rousseau and now championed by anarcho-primitivism. Primitivism is easily dismissed as an extreme, naïve and impractical form of radical environmentalism but its emergence signifies contemporary disaffection with the ideology of ‘progress’ so central to modernity and capitalism. This paper offers an ethico-political interpretation of primitivism's critical relation to modernity in terms of the dialectic between amorality (innocence) and immorality (guilt) within what is characterised as modernity's ‘culture of contamination’.