1974/01/01 by Gregory Casey · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #American Constitutional Law and Politics #Certiorari #History #Judicial and Constitutional Studies #Law #Mythology #Original jurisdiction #Political science #Remand (court procedure) #Supreme court
paper · doi:10.2307/3053081
openalex publication_date 1974/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
The mass public is often depicted as indifferent to and unaware of many facets of political life which elites deem essential to understanding the political process (Converse, 1964: 209-14, 231-41; Key, 1964: 182-85, 199-202). Yet despite its indifference to political reality as defined by elites, the general public does hold its own version of political reality - albeit a more emotional, more symbolic, and less concrete reality than elites view (Prothro and Grigg, 1960: 276-94; Edelman, 1967: 1-7, 12-19, 178-81; Berger and Luckmann, 1966: 31-34). Popular perceptions of the United States Supreme Court follow this pattern: on the one hand, most observers take for granted that the public appreciates the Court on a symbolic or mythical plane while, on the other hand, most research concludes that the masses lack factual information on this institution.