2012/01/01 by Els Elffers · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Mathematics · #Appeal #Computer science #Epistemology #Etymology #Historical Linguistics and Language Studies #Linguistics #Linguistics and Discourse Analysis #Mathematics #Meaning (existential) #Nominalism #Philosophy #Relativism #Semantics (computer science) #Structuralism (philosophy of science) #Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation #Variety (cybernetics)
paper · pdf · doi:10.3406/hel.2012.3235
openalex publication_date 2012/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02
Cognitive linguistics (CL) is often regarded as a continuation of Saussurean structuralism. This paper explores the relationship between the two paradigms, focussing on the connection between semantics and views on the language-thought relationship. As it turns out, the similarity in this respect is, in fact, only partial. Saussure explicitly rejects linguistic relativism (LR) ; his purely differential view of meaning actually allows for only a weak variety of LR. Stronger varieties of LR are defended in CL, in agreement with a very “ rich” conception of meaning, which can be shown to build on 19th century Humboldtian views rather than Saussurean structuralism. It is argued that this return to earlier approaches can be regarded as both positive (e. g. in its sensitivity to culture-related aspects of meanings) and negative (e. g. in its naïve appeal to etymology).