2006/07/17 by Barton P. Miller, Gregory Cooksey, F. Hardy Moore · 1 citation
Computer Science · #Software Testing and Debugging Techniques #Software Reliability and Analysis Research #Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
paper · doi:10.1145/1145735.1145743
openalex publication_date 2006/07/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
We report on the fourth in a series of studies on the reliability of application programs in the face of random input. Over the previous 15 years, we have studied the reliability of UNIX command line and X-Window based (GUI) applications and Windows applications. In this study, we apply our fuzz testing techniques to applications running on the Mac OS X operating system. We continue to use a simple, or even simplistic technique: unstructured black-box random testing, considering a failure to be a crash or hang. As in the previous three studies, the technique is crude but seems to be effective in locating bugs in real programs.We tested the reliability of 135 command-line UNIX utilities and thirty graphical applications on Mac OS X by feeding random input to each. We report on application failures -- crashes (dumps core) or hangs (loops indefinitely) -- and, where source code is available, we identify the causes of these failures and categorize them.Our testing crashed only 7% of the command-line utilities, a considerably lower rate of failure than observed in almost all cases of previous studies. We found the GUI-based applications to be less reliable: of the thirty that we tested, only eight did not crash or hang. Twenty others crashed, and two hung. These GUI results were noticeably worse than either of the previous Windows (Win32) or UNIX (X-Windows) studies.