2011/12/07 by Emily Rauscher, Kristen Menou · 4 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astrophysics #Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies #Atmosphere (unit) #Computational physics #Drag #Exoplanet #Hot Jupiter #Mechanics #Optics #Physics #Planet #Radiative transfer #Scale height #Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #Thermodynamics #astro-ph.EP
paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/2/96
29 pages, 12 figures, 2 tables, submitted to ApJ
arxiv created 2011/12/07 · openalex publication_date 2012/04/18 · arxiv updated 2015/06/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
ABSTRACT We present a new version of our code for modeling the atmospheric circulation on gaseous exoplanets, now employing a “double-gray” radiative transfer scheme, which self-consistently solves for fluxes and heating throughout the atmosphere, including the emerging (observable) infrared flux. We separate the radiation into infrared and optical components, each with its own absorption coefficient, and solve standard two-stream radiative transfer equations. We use a constant optical absorption coefficient, while the infrared coefficient can scale as a power law with pressure; however, for simplicity, the results shown in this paper use a constant infrared coefficient. Here we describe our new code in detail and demonstrate its utility by presenting a generic hot Jupiter model. We discuss issues related to modeling the deepest pressures of the atmosphere and describe our use of the diffusion approximation for radiative fluxes at high optical depths. In addition, we present new models using a simple form for magnetic drag on the atmosphere. We calculate emitted thermal phase curves and find that our drag-free model has the brightest region of the atmosphere offset by ∼12° from the substellar point and a minimum flux that is 17% of the maximum, while the model with the strongest magnetic drag has an offset of only ∼2° and a ratio of 13%. Finally, we calculate rates of numerical loss of kinetic energy at ∼15% for every model except for our strong-drag model, where there is no measurable loss; we speculate that this is due to the much decreased wind speeds in that model.