2011/03/31 by Tim Adamo, Lionel Mason · 42 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Black Holes and Theoretical Physics #Feynman diagram #Mathematical physics #Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Physics #Position and momentum space #Propagator #Quantum mechanics #Twistor space #Twistor theory #hep-th
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065019
published in Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields 86(6) (American Physical Society) · 53 pages, 13 figures. v2: typos and error in discussion of loop diagrams corrected; v3: includes new derivation of momentum space MHV rules, 3 new appendices, and errors in statements concerning the cohomological interpretation are now corrected; v4: published version
openalex publication_date 2012/09/14 · arxiv created 2012/10/05 · arxiv updated 2015/05/27 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Maximally helicity-violating (MHV) diagrams give an efficient Feynman diagramlike formalism for calculating gauge theory scattering amplitudes on momentum space. Although they arise as the Feynman diagrams from an action on twistor space in an axial gauge, the main ingredients were previously expressed only in momentum space and momentum twistor space. Here we show how the formalism can be elegantly derived and expressed entirely in twistor space. This brings out the underlying superconformal invariance of the framework (up to the choice of a reference twistor used to define the axial gauge) and makes the twistor support transparent. Our treatment is largely independent of signature, although we focus on Lorentz signature. Starting from the N=4 super-Yang-Mills twistor action, we obtain the propagator for the antiholomorphic Dolbeault operator as a delta function imposing collinear support with the reference twistor defining the axial gauge. The MHV vertices are also expressed in terms of similar delta functions. We obtain concrete formulas for tree-level NkMHV diagrams as a product of MHV amplitudes with an R invariant for each propagator; here the R invariant manifests superconformal as opposed to dual-superconformal invariance. This gives the expected explicit support on k+1 lines linked by k further lines associated to the propagators. The R invariants arising correspond to those obtained in the dual conformal invariant momentum twistor version of the formalism, but differences arise in the specification of the boundary terms. Surprisingly, in this framework, some finite loop integrals can be performed as simply as those for tree diagrams.