On understanding the figures of merit for detection and measurement of x-ray polarization

2010/06/23 by Martin C. Weisskopf, Ronald F. Elsner, Stephen L. O'Dell · 2 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #astro-ph.IM #astro-ph.HE

paper · pdf · doi:10.1117/12.857357

5 pages, 2 figures, to be presented at SPIE conference 7732 (paper 13), corrected typos

arxiv created 2010/06/23 · arxiv updated 2015/05/19

Abstract

The prospects for accomplishing X-ray polarization measurements appear to have grown in recent years after a more than 35-year hiatus. Unfortunately, this long hiatus has brought with it some confusion over the statistical uncertainties associated with polarization measurements of astronomical sources. The heart of this confusion stems from a misunderstanding (or potential misunderstanding) of a standard figure of merit-the minimum detectable polarization (MDP)-that one of us introduced many years ago. We review the relevant statistics, and quantify the differences between the MDP and the uncertainty of an actual polarization measurement. We discuss the implications for future missions.

Cited by

• A new NASA Pioneer: the Globe Orbiting Soft X-ray Polarimeter (GOSoX)
• Spectral performance of single-channel plastic and GAGG scintillator bars of the CUbesat Solar Polarimeter (CUSP)

Related

• The growth of interest for astronomical X-ray polarimetry
• X-ray Astronomical Polarimetry in the XEUS Era
• X-ray Polarimetry in the Low Statistics Regime using the Bayesian Approach Reveals Polarization Angle Variations
• High Energy Polarization and the Crab: Historical Remarks
• An X-ray Polarimeter for Constellation-X