vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

How should one formulate, extract and interpret ‘non-observables’ for nuclei?

2010/01/02 by R. J. Furnstahl, R J Furnstahl, A. Schwenk +1 · 2 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Convolution (computer science) #Decomposition #Distribution (mathematics) #Hadron #Nuclear data #Nuclear physics research studies #Observable #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Parton #Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions #hep-ph #nucl-ex #nucl-th

paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/37/6/064005

7 pages. Contribution to the "Focus issue on Open Problems in Nuclear Structure", Journal of Physics G

arxiv created 2010/01/02 · openalex publication_date 2010/03/29 · arxiv updated 2015/05/14 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Nuclear observables such as binding energies and cross sections can be directly measured. Other physically useful quantities, such as spectroscopic factors, are related to measured quantities by a convolution whose decomposition is not unique. Can a framework for these nuclear structure 'non-observables' be formulated systematically so that they can be extracted from experiment with known uncertainties and calculated with consistent theory? Parton distribution functions in hadrons serve as an illustrative example of how this can be done. A systematic framework is also needed to address questions of interpretation, such as whether short-range correlations are important for nuclear structure.

Citations

Cited by