vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Are12CO lines good indicators of the star formation rate in galaxies?

2009/06/16 by E. Bayet, Maryvonne Gérin, M. Gerin +2 · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #Astrophysics #Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Galaxy #Homogeneous #Line (geometry) #Luminosity #Physics #Redshift #Star (game theory) #Star formation #Statistical physics #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #astro-ph.CO

paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15258.x

10 pages, 3 figures and 4 tables, Accepted in MNRAS

arxiv created 2009/06/16 · openalex publication_date 2009/09/14 · arxiv updated 2015/05/13 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the relevance of using the 12CO line emissions as indicators of star formation rates (SFR). For the first time, we present this study for a relatively large number of 12CO transitions (12) as well as over a large interval in redshift (from z∼0 to z∼6). For the nearby sources (D≤10 Mpc), we have used homogeneous sample of 12CO data provided by Bayet et al. (2004, 2006), mixing observational and modelled line intensities. For higher-z sources (z ≥ 1), we have collected 12CO observations from various papers and have completed the data set of line intensities with model predictions which we also present in this paper. Finally, for increasing the statistics, we have included recent 12CO(1-0) and 12CO(3-2) observations of intermediate-z sources. Linear regressions have been calculated for identifying the tightest SFR-12CO line luminosity relationships. We show that the total 12CO, the 12CO(5-4), the 12CO(6-5) and the 12CO(7-6) luminosities are the best indicators of SFR (as measured by the far-infrared luminosity). Comparisons with theoretical approaches from Krumholz and Thompson (2007) and Narayanan et al. (2008) are also performed in this paper. Although in general agreement, the predictions made by these authors and the observational results we present here show small and interesting discrepancies. In particular, the slope of the linear regressions, for Jupper≥ 4 12CO lines are not similar between theoretical studies and observations. On one hand, a larger high-J 12CO data set of observations might help to better agree with models, increasing the statistics. On the other hand, theoretical studies extended to high redshift sources might also reduce such discrepancies.

Citations

Cited by