2012/12/31 by D. M. Xun, Quanhui Liu, Q. H. Liu +2 · 1 citation
Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Canonical coordinates #Canonical quantization #Cartesian coordinate system #Classical mechanics #Clifford torus #Covariant Hamiltonian field theory #Geometry #Hamiltonian (control theory) #Hamiltonian system #Mathematical analysis #Mathematical physics #Mathematics #Mechanical and Optical Resonators #Phase space #Physics #Quantization (signal processing) #Quantum #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics #Quantum gravity #Quantum mechanics #Submanifold #Torus #math-ph #math.MP #quant-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2013.07.008
published as Ann. Phys. 338(2013)123 · 10 pages, no figure, typos added, introduction rewritten
arxiv created 2013/02/11 · openalex publication_date 2013/08/10 · arxiv updated 2014/10/07 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
A generalization of the Dirac's canonical quantization theory for a system with second-class constraints is proposed as the fundamental commutation relations that are constituted by all commutators between positions, momenta and Hamiltonian so they are simultaneously quantized in a self-consistent manner, rather than by those between merely positions and momenta so the theory either contains redundant freedoms or conflicts with experiments. The application of the generalized theory to quantum motion on a torus leads to two remarkable results: i) The theory formulated purely on the torus, i.e., based on the so-called the purely intrinsic geometry, conflicts with itself. So it provides an explanation why an intrinsic examination of quantum motion on torus within the Schrodinger formalism is improper. ii) An extrinsic examination of the torus as a submanifold in three dimensional flat space turns out to be self-consistent and the resultant momenta and Hamiltonian are satisfactory all around.