2008/11/06 by Martin Stevens, Sami Merilaita · 7 citations
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Neuroscience · Psychology · #Animal Behavior and Reproduction #Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies #Animal and Plant Science Education
paper · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0216
openalex publication_date 2008/11/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Disruptive coloration breaks up the shape and destroys the outline of an object, hindering detection. The principle was first suggested approximately a century ago, but, although research has significantly increased, the field remains conceptually unstructured and no unambiguous definition exists. This has resulted in variable use of the term, making it difficult to formulate testable hypotheses that are comparable between studies, slowing down advancement in this field. Related to this, a range of studies do not effectively distinguish between disruption and other forms of camouflage. Here, we give a formal definition of disruptive coloration, reorganize a range of sub-principles involved in camouflage and argue that five in particular are specifically related to disruption: differential blending; maximum disruptive contrast; disruption of surface through false edges; disruptive marginal patterns; and coincident disruptive coloration. We discuss how disruptive coloration can be optimized, how it can relate to other forms of camouflage markings and where future work is particularly needed.