2014/07/28 by Jian-Ming Shen, Xing-Gang Wu, Hong-Hao Ma +1 · 24 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Combinatorics #Coupling (piping) #Energy (signal processing) #High-Energy Particle Collisions Research #Order (exchange) #Particle physics #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Physics #Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions #Quantum chromodynamics #Quantum mechanics #hep-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.034025
published in Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields 90(3) (American Physical Society) · 11 pages, 5 figures
arxiv created 2014/07/28 · openalex publication_date 2014/08/29 · arxiv updated 2014/09/02 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We present a detailed analysis on the Bc meson semileptonic decays, Bc\ensuremath→\ensuremathηc(J/\ensuremathψ)\ensuremathℓ\ensuremathν, up to next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD correction. We adopt the principle of maximum conformality (PMC) to set the renormalization scales for those decays. After applying the PMC scale setting, we determine the optimal renormalization scales for the Bc\ensuremath→\ensuremathηc(J/\ensuremathψ) transition form factors (TFFs). Because of the same \ensuremathβ0-terms, the optimal PMC scales at the NLO level are the same for all those TFFs, i.e., \ensuremathμrPMC\ensuremath≈0.8 GeV. We adopt a strong coupling model from the massive perturbation theory to achieve a reliable pQCD estimation in this low energy region. Furthermore, we adopt a monopole form as an extrapolation for the Bc\ensuremath→\ensuremathηc(J/\ensuremathψ) TFFs to all their allowable q2 region. Then, we predict \mathrm\ensuremathΓ_Bc\ensuremath→\ensuremathηc\ensuremathℓ\ensuremathν(\ensuremathℓ=e,\ensuremathμ)=(71.53_\ensuremath-8.90+11.27)\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fi10^\ensuremath-15 GeV, \mathrm\ensuremathΓ_Bc\ensuremath→\ensuremathηc\ensuremathτ\ensuremathν=(27.14_\ensuremath-4.33+5.93)\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fi10^\ensuremath-15 GeV, \mathrm\ensuremathΓ_Bc\ensuremath→J/\ensuremathψ\ensuremathℓ\ensuremathν(\ensuremathℓ=e,\ensuremathμ)=(106.31_\ensuremath-14.01+18.59)\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fi10^\ensuremath-15 GeV, \mathrm\ensuremathΓ_Bc\ensuremath→J/\ensuremathψ\ensuremathτ\ensuremathν=\phantom\rule0ex0ex(28.25_\ensuremath-4.35+6.02)\ifmmode×\else\texttimes\fi10^\ensuremath-15 GeV, where the uncertainties are squared averages of all the mentioned error sources. We show that the present prediction of the production cross section times branching ratio for Bc+\ensuremath→J/\ensuremathψ\ensuremathℓ+v relative to that for B+\ensuremath→J/\ensuremathψK+, i.e., \ensuremath\mathfrakR(J/\ensuremathψ\ensuremathℓ+\ensuremathν), is in a better agreement with CDF measurements than the previous predictions.