vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Differentiating Diversities: Moral Diversity Is Not Like Other Kinds1

2003/01/01 by Jonathan Haidt, Evan Rosenberg, Evan C. Rosenberg +1 · 190 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Aesthetics #Affirmative action #Cultural Differences and Values #Cultural diversity #Diversity (politics) #Epistemology #Gender Diversity and Inequality #Identity (music) #Immigration #Law #Multiculturalism #Philosophy #Political science #Politics #Psychology #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social group #Social identity theory #Social psychology #Sociology

paper · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb02071.x

published in Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33(1), 1-36 (Wiley)

openalex publication_date 2003/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23

Abstract

Diversity is widely celebrated in American society. But from a social psychological point of view, diversity ought to cause a number of problems, such as divisiveness and conflict. A resolution of this paradox is proposed: There are several kinds of diversity, with different profiles of costs and benefits. In particular, moral diversity is identified as being problematic and even self‐contradictory. Three studies of attitudes and desires for interaction among college students confirmed that moral diversity reduces desires for interaction more than does demographic diversity, and that both kinds of diversity are valued more in a classroom than in other social settings. These findings have important implications for discussions of diversity, multiculturalism, affirmative action, identity politics, and immigration policy.

Citations

Cited by

Related