vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Comparative immunopathogenesis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, and multiple sclerosis

2007/05/10 by Dean M. Wingerchuk, Claudia F. Lucchinetti · 2 citations
Medicine · #Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies #Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders #Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

paper · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e3280be58d8

openalex publication_date 2007/05/10 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advanced immunopathological techniques hold promise for more precise diagnosis of idiopathic demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. We review recent progress in differentiating and understanding the disease mechanisms of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, and classical multiple sclerosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Four distinct immunopathological patterns have been described in multiple sclerosis patients, potentially implicating different inflammatory, demyelinating, and apoptotic mechanisms. A specific serum biomarker, neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulin G, is strongly associated with neuromyelitis optica and identifies patients with severe optic nerve and spinal cord lesions with specific pathological features such as eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrates, necrosis, vascular hyalinization, and extensive vasculocentric immunoglobulin and complement deposition. This biomarker targets the water channel aquaporin-4, which is lost in neuromyelitis optica lesions. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis still has no validated clinical diagnostic criteria but its perivenous pathological findings distinguish it from multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. SUMMARY: The clinically heterogeneous group of idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system is characterized by several immunopathological patterns that suggest the involvement of diverse pathogenic effector mechanisms. Future advances in experimental pathology, immunology, molecular genetics, and neuroimaging, as well as the discovery of specific biomarkers, will more precisely define these disorders and lead to better targeted therapies.

Citations

Cited by