1986/05/22 by Paula Menyuk, Lise Menu, Ronnie Silber · 4 citations
Psychology · #Language Development and Disorders #Child and Animal Learning Development
paper · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620683.012
openalex publication_date 1986/05/22 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
Introduction Not until this past decade has the notion of the development of perceptual and productive phonemic contrasts during the so-called ‘prelinguistic’ period been taken seriously by linguists. Previously it was held that during this period infants engaged in playful sound making. The sounds produced were held to be largely a product of the random exercise of the human infant's vocal mechanism for sound making, and, therefore, the sounds produced were universal. Further, Jakobson (1968) suggested that there was a silent period between the production of babbled utterances and the production of first words. This silent period indicated the discontinuity between the two periods. Some behaviourist researchers, in contrast to this, suggested that this prelinguistic period was one during which the child's perception and production of sound contrasts was ‘shaped’ by parental input to take on gradually the characteristics of the adult's perception and production of sounds in the native language. This shaping occurred through the principles of conditioning (i.e. observing stimulus–response–reward relations). These sound generalizations were then chunked into words and the words into sentences. The most perceptually salient sounds were those mastered earliest. Therefore, no discontinuity could be said to exist between so-called prelinguistic and linguistic behaviour (Olmsted 1966; Staats 1967). Recent data on the discrimination and production of speech sound contrasts by infants, that both these positions are questionable (Ferguson 1976).