vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Ibrat,hasrat,ortahdid: Turkish modernity in the eyes of Iranian nationalist modernists in the Qajar-Pahlavi interregnum

2020/07/07 by Naseraddin Alizadeh · 2 citations
Social Sciences · #Islamic Studies and History #Turkey's Politics and Society #Religion and Society Interactions

paper · doi:10.1080/14683849.2020.1788943

openalex publication_date 2020/07/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06

Abstract

This study examines the ways in which various aspects of Turkish modernity, including gender reforms and nation-building, were reconstructed by the Berlin Circle, whose members were the ideologues of nationalist authoritarian modernization in Iran. To this end, I analyzed texts published between 1923 and 25 in Iranshahr and Nameye Farangestan, two important periodicals of the Berlin Circle. The results of this study show that while gender reforms were welcomed, longingly desired [hasrat], and upheld as a lesson [ibrat], Turkish nationalism was mostly perceived as a threat [tahdid]. This decentralized and horizontal view towards Turkish modernity suggests that its reconstructed image served to transfer and propagate different messages that implied the possibility of modernization reforms in an Islamic country like Iran and induced anxieties to push Iranian society to an imagined ideal future.

Citations

Cited by

Related