2021/06/30 by Alessandro Castelnovo, Riccardo Crupi, Greta Greco +4 · 2 citations
Computer Science · Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #cs.CY #cs.LG #stat.ML
paper · pdf · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07939-1
published as Sci Rep 12, 4209 (2022) · 26 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables, title updated: previous title was "The Zoo of Fairness metrics in Machine Learning", authors updated
openalex publication_date 2022/03/10 · arxiv created 2022/03/11 · arxiv updated 2022/03/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
In recent years, the problem of addressing fairness in Machine Learning (ML) and automatic decision-making has attracted a lot of attention in the scientific communities dealing with Artificial Intelligence. A plethora of different definitions of fairness in ML have been proposed, that consider different notions of what is a "fair decision" in situations impacting individuals in the population. The precise differences, implications and "orthogonality" between these notions have not yet been fully analyzed in the literature. In this work, we try to make some order out of this zoo of definitions.