2006/08/31 by Gintaras Duda, Gintaras Dūda, Ann Kemper +1 · 2 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Atomic physics #Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena #Dark matter #Elastic scattering #Electron #Electron scattering #Form factor (electronics) #Neutralino #Nuclear matter #Nuclear physics #Nucleon #Particle Detector Development and Performance #Particle physics #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Physics #Proton #Quantum mechanics #Recoil #Scattering #WIMP #hep-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/04/012
published as JCAP 0704:012,2007 · 20 pages, 8 figures
openalex publication_date 2007/04/18 · arxiv created 2007/08/13 · arxiv updated 2010/10/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
Theoretical calculations of neutralino–nucleon interaction rates with various nuclei are of great interest to direct dark matter searches such as CDMS, EDELWEISS, ZEPLIN and other experiments since they are used to establish upper bounds on the WIMP–proton cross section. These interaction rates and cross sections are generally computed with standard, one- or two-parameter model-dependent nuclear form factors, which may not exactly mirror the actual form factor for the particular nucleus in question. As is well known, elastic electron scattering can allow for very precise determinations of nuclear form factors and hence nuclear charge densities for spherical or near-spherical nuclei. We use charge densities derived from elastic electron scattering data to calculate model-independent, analytic form factors for various target nuclei important in dark matter searches, such as Si, Ge, S, Ca and others. We have found that for nuclear recoils in the range of 1–100 keV significant differences in cross sections and rates exist when the model-independent form factors are used: at 30 keV nuclear recoil the form factors squared differ by a factor of 1.06 for 28 Si, 1.11 for 40 Ca, 1.27 for 70 Ge and 1.92 for 129 Xe. We show the effect of different form factors on the upper limit on the WIMP–proton cross section obtained with a hypothetical 70 Ge detector during a 50 kg-d effective exposure. Helm form factors with various parameter choices differ at most by 10–20% from the best (Fourier–Bessel) form factor, and can approach it to better than 1% if the parameters are chosen to mimic the actual nuclear density.