2009/02/03 by Sloane J. Wiktorowicz, Sloane Wiktorowicz · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #Astro and Planetary Science #Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #astro-ph.EP
paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/2/1116
published as Astrophys.J.696:1116-1124,2009 · 24 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ
arxiv created 2009/02/03 · openalex publication_date 2009/04/22 · arxiv updated 2010/05/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
Using the POLISH instrument, I am unable to reproduce the large-amplitude polarimetric observations of Berdyugina et al. to the >99.99% confidence level. I observe no significant polarimetric variability in the HD 189733 system, and the upper limit to variability from the exoplanet is Δ P < 7.9 × 10 −5 with 99% confidence in the 400–675 nm wavelength range. Berdyugina et al. report polarized, scattered light from the atmosphere of the HD 189733b hot Jupiter with an amplitude of two parts in 10 4 . Such a large amplitude is over an order of magnitude larger than expected given a geometric albedo similar to other hot Jupiters. However, my nondetection of polarimetric variability phase-locked to the orbital period of the exoplanet, and the lack of any significant variability, shows that the polarimetric modulation reported by Berdyugina et al. cannot be due to the exoplanet.