2005/09/30 by R. Mandelbaum, Rachel Mandelbaum, Christopher M. Hirata +7 · 2 citations
Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Dark energy #Extrapolation #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Galaxy #Gravitational lens #Photometric redshift #Redshift #Sky #Space Technology and Applications #Spectral density #Weak gravitational lensing #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09946.x
published as Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.367:611-626,2006 · 16 pages, matches version published in MNRAS (only minor changes in presentation from original version)
openalex publication_date 2006/02/21 · arxiv created 2006/03/27 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
The power spectrum of weak lensing shear caused by large-scale structure is an emerging tool for precision cosmology, in particular for measuring the effects of dark energy on the growth of structure at low redshift. One potential source of systematic error is intrinsic alignments of ellipticities of neighbouring galaxies [the intrinsic ellipticity—intrinsic ellipticity (II) correlation] that could mimic the correlations due to lensing. A related possibility pointed out by Hirata & Seljak is correlation between the intrinsic ellipticities of galaxies and the density field responsible for gravitational lensing shear [the gravitational shear—intrinsic ellipticity (GI) correlation]. We present constraints on both the II and GI correlations using 265 908 spectroscopic galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and using galaxies as tracers of the mass in the case of the GI analysis. The availability of redshifts in the SDSS allows us to select galaxies at small radial separations, which both reduces noise in the intrinsic alignment measurement and suppresses galaxy—galaxy lensing (which otherwise swamps the GI correlation). While we find no detection of the II correlation, our results are none the less statistically consistent with recent detections found using the SuperCOSMOS survey. Extrapolation of these limits to cosmic shear surveys at z∼ 1 suggests that the II correlation is unlikely to have been a significant source of error for current measurements of σ8 with∼ 10 per cent accuracy, but may still be an issue for future surveys with projected statistical errors below the 1 per cent level unless eliminated using photometric redshifts. In contrast, we have a clear detection of GI correlation in galaxies brighter than L* that persists to the largest scales probed (60 h−1 Mpc) and with a sign predicted by theoretical models. This correlation could cause the existing lensing surveys at z∼ 1 to underestimate the linear amplitude of fluctuations by as much as 20 per cent depending on the source sample used, while for surveys at z∼ 0.5 the underestimation may reach 30 per cent. The GI contamination is dominated by the brightest galaxies, possibly due to the alignment of brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) with the cluster ellipticity due to anisotropic infall along filaments, although other sources of contamination cannot be excluded at this point. We propose that cosmic shear surveys should consider rejection of BCGs from their source catalogues as a test for GI contamination. Future high-precision weak lensing surveys must develop methods to search for and remove this contamination if they are to achieve their promise.