2008/10/31 by Mario G. Abadi, Julio F. Navarro, Matthias Steinmetz · 9 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/2/l63
4 pages, 4 figures. Replacement to match version accepted to ApJL
arxiv created 2008/11/28 · openalex publication_date 2009/01/08 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
Halo stars with unusually high radial velocity (hypervelocity stars, or HVS) are thought to be stars unbound to the Milky Way that originate from the gravitational interaction of stellar systems with the supermassive black hole at the Galactic center. We examine the latest HVS compilation and find peculiarities that are unexpected in this black hole ejection scenario. For example, a large fraction of HVS cluster around the constellation of Leo and share a common travel time of ∼100–200 Myr. Furthermore, their velocities are not really extreme if, as suggested by recent galaxy formation models, the Milky Way is embedded within a 2.5 × 10 12 h −1 M ☉ dark halo with virial velocity of ∼220 km s −1 . In this case, the escape velocity at ∼50 kpc would be ∼600 km s −1 , and very few HVS would be truly unbound. We use numerical simulations to show that disrupting dwarf galaxies may contribute halo stars with velocities up to and sometimes exceeding the nominal escape speed of the system. These stars are arranged in a thinly collimated outgoing "tidal tail" stripped from the dwarf during its latest pericentric passage. We speculate that some HVS may, therefore, be tidal debris from a dwarf recently disrupted near the center of the Galaxy. In this interpretation, the angular clustering of HVS results because, from our perspective, the tail is seen nearly "end on," whereas the common travel time simply reflects the fact that these stars were stripped simultaneously from the dwarf during a single pericentric passage. This proposal is eminently falsifiable, since it makes a number of predictions which are distinct from the black hole ejection mechanism and which should be testable with improved HVS datasets.