2008/01/10 by R. Gavazzi, Raphael Gavazzi, Tommaso Treu +7 · 7 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Astrophysics #Classical mechanics #Einstein #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae #Lens (geology) #Optics #Physics #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1086/529541
arxiv created 2008/01/10 · openalex publication_date 2008/04/10 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We report the discovery of two concentric Einstein rings around the gravitational lens SDSS J0946+1006. The main lens is at redshift z l = 0.222, while the inner ring (1) is at redshift z s1 = 0.609 ( R Ein 1 = 1.43'' ± 0.01''). The wider image separation ( R Ein 2 = 2.07''± 0.02'') of the outer ring (2) implies a higher redshift than that of ring 1; the detection of ring 2 in the F814W ACS filter implies an upper limit of z s2 ≲ 6.9. The main lens can be described by a power-law total mass density profile ρ tot ∝ r −γ' with γ' = 2.00 ± 0.03 and velocity dispersion σ SIE = 287 ± 5 km s −1 (the stellar velocity dispersion is σ v,* = 284 ± 24 km s −1 ). The strong lensing configuration is inconsistent with light traces mass. Adopting a prior on the stellar mass-to-light ratio from previous SLACS work, we infer a 73% ± 9% dark matter fraction within the cylinder of radius equal to the effective radius of the lens. We find that, for the case of SDSS J0946+1006, the geometry of the two rings does not place interesting constraints on cosmography because of the suboptimal redshifts of lens and sources. We then consider the perturbing effect of the mass associated with ring 1 building a compound lens model. This introduces minor changes to the mass of the main lens and provides an estimate of z s2 = 3.1 + 2.0 −1.0 and of the mass of the source responsible for ring 1 (σ SIE ,s1 = 94 + 27 −47 km s −1 ). We conclude by examining the prospects of doing cosmography with a sample of 50 double rings, expected from future space-based surveys. Accounting for uncertainties in the mass profile of the lens and the effects of the perturber, we find that such a sample would constrain Ω m and w within 10%, assuming flatness.