2015/02/12 by Christilla Roederer‐Rynning, Justin Greenwood · 2 citations
Social Sciences · #Philippine History and Culture #Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies #European Union Policy and Governance
paper · doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.992934
openalex publication_date 2015/02/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
There is surprisingly little knowledge about the informal ‘trilogues’ that play a pivotal role in almost 90 per cent of European Union legislation. This article maps out previously uncharted practices and explores their role in constituting the Parliament and Council as legislators. It proceeds by taking stock of the knowledge that actors in Parliament, the Council and the Commission have acquired and use to make sense of, and act in, trilogues. Our findings qualify the widespread belief that trilogues have drawn Parliament into unfamiliar territory of diplomatic culture, at a cost to political efficacy and democratic functions. Trilogues today are underpinned by norms, standard operating procedures and practices linking formal and informal institutions. They have imparted Parliament with a sharpened consciousness of its role and identity as a ‘normal’ parliament, while leaving the Council frustrated and less confident. Parliament has seen in norms of public accountability a means to develop leverage over the Council.