vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

NGC 2298: a globular cluster on its way to disruption

2006/12/01 by Guido De Marchi, G. De Marchi, L. Pulone +1 · 26 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Blue straggler #Cluster (spacecraft) #Galaxy #Globular cluster #Halo #Horizontal branch #Luminosity #Metallicity #Scientific Research and Discoveries #Spiral galaxy #Stars #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #astro-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066719

published in Astronomy and Astrophysics 467(1), 107-115 (EDP Sciences) · 9 pages, 6 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics

arxiv created 2006/12/01 · openalex publication_date 2007/02/12 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

We have studied the stellar main sequence (MS) of the globular cluster NGC 2298 using deep HST/ACS observations in the F606W and F814W bands covering an area of around the cluster centre or about twice the cluster's half-mass radius. The colour-magnitude diagram that we derive in this way reveals a narrow and well defined MS extending down to the detection limit at 26.5, 25, corresponding to stars of ~0.2 . The luminosity function (LF) obtained with these data, once corrected for the limited effects of photometric incompleteness, reveals a remarkable deficiency of low-mass stars as well as a radial gradient, in that the LF becomes progressively steeper with radius. Using the mass-luminosity relation appropriate for the metallicity of NGC 2298, we derive the cluster's global mass function (GMF) by using a multi-mass Michie-King model. Over the range 0.8-0.2 , the number of stars per unit mass decreases following a power-law distribution of the type , where, for comparison, typical halo clusters have . If the IMF of NGC 2298 was similar to that of other metal poor halo clusters, like e.g. NGC 6397, the present GMF that we obtain implies that this object must have lost of the order of 85% of its original mass, at a rate much higher than that suggested by current models based on the available cluster orbit. The latter may, therefore, need revision.

Citations