2002/06/01 by John Core, John E. Core, Wayne Guay +1 · 1,844 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Accounting #Binary option #Capital Investment and Risk Analysis #Corporate Finance and Governance #Econometrics #Economics #Equity (law) #Explanatory power #Finance #Financial Reporting and Valuation Research #Financial economics #Implied volatility #Moneyness #Non-qualified stock option #Portfolio #Restricted stock #Stock (firearms) #Stock market #Stock options #Valuation (finance) #Valuation of options #Volatility (finance)
paper · open access · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.00064
published in Journal of Accounting Research 40(3), 613-630 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2002/06/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
The costs associated with compiling data on employee stock option portfolios is a substantial obstacle in investigating the impact of stock options on managerial incentives, accounting choice, financing decisions, and the valuation of equity. We present an accurate method of estimating option portfolio value and the sensitivities of option portfolio value to stock price and stock‐return volatility that is easily implemented using data from only the current year’s proxy statement or annual report. This method can be applied to either executive stock option portfolios or to firm‐wide option plans. In broad samples of actual and simulated CEO option portfolios, we show that these proxies capture more than 99% of the variation in option portfolio value and sensitivities. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the degree of bias in these proxies varies with option portfolio characteristics, and is most severe in samples of CEOs with a large proportion of out‐of‐the‐money options. However, the proxies’ explanatory power remains above 95% in all subsamples.