2005/07/31 by C. Albertus, E. Hernández, E. Hernandez +3 · 2 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Computer science #High-Energy Particle Collisions Research #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions #hep-ph #nucl-th
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.094022
published as Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) 094022 · 8 latex pages. Shortened version accepted for publication in Physical Review D
arxiv created 2005/11/03 · openalex publication_date 2005/11/22 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We present results for the strong widths corresponding to the \ensuremathΣc\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc\ensuremathπ, \ensuremathΣc*\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc\ensuremathπ and \ensuremathΞc*\ensuremath→\ensuremathΞc\ensuremathπ decays. The calculations have been done in a nonrelativistic constituent quark model with wave functions that take advantage of the constraints imposed by heavy quark symmetry. Partial conservation of axial current hypothesis allows us to determine the strong vertices from an analysis of the axial current matrix elements. Our results \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΣc++\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ+)=2.41\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.07\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.02 MeV, \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΣc+\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ0)=2.79\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.08\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.02 MeV, \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΣc0\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ^\ensuremath-)=2.37\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.07\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.02 MeV, \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΣc*++\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ+)=17.52\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.74\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.12 MeV, \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΣc*+\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ0)=17.31\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.73\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.12 MeV, \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΣc*0\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ^\ensuremath-)=16.90\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.71\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.12 MeV, \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΞc*+\ensuremath→\ensuremathΞc0\ensuremathπ++\ensuremathΞc+\ensuremathπ0)=3.18\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.10\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.01 MeV, and \ensuremathΓ(\ensuremathΞc*0\ensuremath→\ensuremathΞc+\ensuremathπ^\ensuremath-+\ensuremathΞc0\ensuremathπ0)=3.03\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.10\ifmmode±\else\textpm\fi0.01 MeV are in good agreement with experimental determinations.