vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Masses and Radii of Low-Mass Stars: Theory Versus Observations

2005/11/15 by Ignasi Ribas, I. Ribas · 8 citations
Physics and Astronomy · Social Sciences · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Educational Leadership and Practices #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #astro-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s10509-006-9081-4

8 pages, 1 figure, proceedings of the meeting "Close Binaries in the 21st Century"

arxiv created 2005/11/15 · openalex publication_date 2006/08/23 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Eclipsing binaries with M-type components are still rare objects. Strong observational biases have made that today only a few eclipsing binaries with component masses below 0.6 Msun and well-determined fundamental properties are known. However, even in these small numbers the detailed comparison of the observed masses and radii with theoretical predictions has revealed large disagreements. Current models seem to predict radii of stars in the 0.4-0.8 Msun range to be some 5-15% smaller than observed. Given the high accuracy of the empirical measurements (a few percent in both mass and radius), these differences are highly significant. I review all the observational evidence on the properties of M-type stars and discuss a possible scenario based on stellar activity to explain the observed discrepancies.

Cited by