vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Comparison of discharge lamp and laser pumped cesium magnetometers

2004/12/02 by S. Groeger, A. S. Pazgalev, A. Weis · 3 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Advanced Frequency and Time Standards #Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research #Quantum optics and atomic interactions #physics.atom-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s00340-005-1773-x

11 pages, 13 figures, 1 table

arxiv created 2004/12/02 · openalex publication_date 2005/03/17 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We have performed a comparison of laser (LsOPM) and lamp (LpOPM) pumped cesium vapor magnetometers. Although the LsOPM operated 50% above its shot-noise limit we found an intrinsic sensitivity of 15 fT/√(Hz) and 25 fT/√(Hz) for the LsOPM and LpOPM respectively. Two modes of operation, viz.,the phase-stabilized and the self-oscillating mode were investigated and found to yield a similar performance. We have compared the performance of the LsOPM and the LpOPM directly by simultaneous measurements of field fluctuations of a 2 microtesla magnetic field inside a multilayer magnetic shield and have used one of the magnetometers for an active field stabilization. In the stabilized mode we found a gradient instability of 25 fT within an integration time of 100 s, which represents an upper limit of the long-term stability of the magnetometers.

Cited by