2001/12/20 by Christine Sylvester · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Gender, Security, and Conflict #International Relations and Foreign Policy #Communism, Protests, Social Movements
paper · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491719.002
openalex publication_date 2001/12/20 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
My journey through feminist IR/IR feminism moves alongside, ahead of, and behind the footsteps and voices of others. Before recalling aspects of the trip, those who marked out important pathways before me deserve to be sighted, sited, and cited. Nostalgia is not what pulls me to the early IR-relevant works of Jean Bethke Elshtain, Cynthia Enloe, and Ann Tickner; nor have these scholars produced research that is above criticism. Rather, these particular progenitors of the feminist IR tradition are lodestars because they developed methods of locating gender and the international around feminism, or women, men and gender around international relations (and IR); their work improved our visual acuity in IR and in feminism; and the citations they provided drew attention to everyday people of international relations and not just to the usual heroic or scholarly men. Works by these writers are also indisputable classics, which is to say they have sustained. Librettos, then, to their efforts. Women and War Jean Bethke Elshtain's Women and War (1987) is a bold rethink of conventional war traditions by an American political theorist who trained in IR but cut her teeth on feminism cum motherhood. Elshtain probes war by juxtaposing conventional and unconventional perspectives on what is done, said, and claimed in and around war.