2003/02/28 by Anton Galajinsky, Anton V. Galajinsky · 4 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Black Holes and Theoretical Physics #Black hole (networking) #Extension (predicate logic) #Horizon #Invariant (physics) #Limit (mathematics) #Mathematical analysis #Mathematical physics #Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Physics #Quantum mechanics #Supersymmetry #Theoretical physics #Townsend #hep-th
paper · pdf · doi:10.1142/s0217732303011241
published as Mod.Phys.Lett. A18 (2003) 1493-1498 · 6 pages, LaTex, no figures, concluding remarks revised, one reference and acknowledgements added
arxiv created 2003/03/06 · openalex publication_date 2003/07/10 · arxiv updated 2009/11/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Recently it was conjectured by Gibbons and Townsend that the large n limit of an N = 4 superconformal extension of the n-particle Calogero model might provide a microscopic description of the extreme Reissner–Nordström black hole near the horizon. In this paper a possibility to construct an SU(1,1|2) invariant extension of the Calogero model is considered. We treat in detail the two-particle case and comment on some peculiarities intrinsic to n > 2 generalizations.