2022/03/01 by Michael A. Wise, Axel Müller, William B. Simmons · 1 citation
paper · doi:10.3749/canmin.1800006
crossref issued 2022/03/01 · crossref published 2022/03/01 · crossref published-print 2022/03/01 · crossref published-online 2022/03/29 · crossref created 2022/03/29 · crossref deposited 2024/09/21 · crossref indexed 2026/07/29
ABSTRACT The current classification of granitic pegmatites, originally introduced by Černý (1991a), has been the accepted system for grouping pegmatites of diverse mineralogy and chemistry for nearly three decades. Despite its general acceptance, several issues have been highlighted (Müller et al. 2022) which have imposed some limitations on its use and therefore necessitated the need to reevaluate its methodology. A new classification for granitic pegmatites is proposed in an attempt to be more inclusive of pegmatite types omitted in previous classification schemes. The new approach utilizes a more comprehensive suite of accessory minerals and defines three pegmatite groups which are genetically related to granite plutons and the anatexis of metaigneous and metasedimentary protoliths. Pegmatites belonging to Groups 1 and 2 are generated from the residual melts of S-, A-, and I-type granite magmatism (RGM) as well as being direct products of anatexis (DPA), whereas Group 3 pegmatites are only derived by anatexis.