2020/10/01 by Antonia Murath · 2 citations
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Aesthetics #Ambiguity #Art #Byzantine Studies and History #Classical Antiquity Studies #Genealogy #History #Invisibility #Law #Liminality #Linguistics #Medieval Literature and History #Monarchy #Motif (music) #Philosophy #Political science #Politics #Power (physics) #Psychoanalysis #Psychology #Sociology
paper · pdf · doi:10.1515/ejss-2020-2002
published in European Journal of Scandinavian Studies 50(2), 257-274 (De Gruyter)
openalex publication_date 2020/10/01 · openalex created_date 2020/11/09 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04
Abstract Like all maiden kings, Nítíða initially rejects her suitors only to accept marriage eventually. Rather than accepting the saga’s ‘happy ending’ as its heroine’s choice, this article argues that her kingship is cast as liminal in Victor Turner’s sense. Her character reflects liminal traits: visual, temporal and sexual ambiguity, mediated through the motif of invisibility, body-thing relations and notions of space. Nítíða’s kingship is structured as a transition to the role of a queen, which she does not take on voluntarily, but because she lacks choice in the face of her increasingly fragile power. Her suitor Livorius ultimately succeeds neither by trickery, military power, nor a courtly approach, but by employing structures Nítíða is excluded from due to her sex. Spared physical violence, she nonetheless suffers structural violence coercing her into a norm-appropriate role and erasing her kingship.