2001/05/14 by Dennis Stello, P. E. Nissen, Poul Erik Nissen · 2 citations
Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation #Historical Astronomy and Related Studies #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010665
11 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
arxiv created 2001/05/14 · openalex publication_date 2001/07/01 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2022/09/27 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
The discrepancy between the Pleiades cluster distance based on Hipparcos parallaxes and main sequence fitting is investigated on the basis of Strömgren photometry of F-type stars. Field stars with the same metallicity as the Pleiades have been selected from the m1 index and a technique has been developed to locate the ZAMS of these field stars in color-magnitude diagrams based on the color/temperature indices , , and β. Fitting the Pleiades to these ZAMS relations results in a distance modulus of mag in contrast to the Hipparcos modulus of mag. Hence, we cannot confirm the recent claim by Grenon ([CITE]) that the distance problem is solved by adopting a low metallicity of the Pleiades () as determined from Geneva photometry. The metallicity sensitivity of the ZAMS determined by the field stars is investigated, and by combining this sensitivity in all three color/temperature indices , , and β we get a independent test of the Pleiades distance modulus which support our value of 5.61 mag. Furthermore, the field star sample used for the comparison is tested against theoretical isochrones of different ages to show that evolutionary effects in the field star sample are not biasing our distance modulus estimate significantly. Possible explanations of the Pleiades distance problem are discussed and it is suggested that the discrepancy in the derived moduli may be linked to a non-spherical shape of the cluster.