vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Probability Distribution Function of Cosmological Density Fluctuations from a Gaussian Initial Condition: Comparison of One‐Point and Two‐Point Lognormal Model Predictions withN‐Body Simulations

2001/05/31 by Issha Kayo, Atsushi Taruya, Yasushi Suto · 9 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #astro-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1086/323227

25 pages, 8 figures, Accepted for publication in ApJ

arxiv created 2001/07/11 · openalex publication_date 2001/11/01 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31

Abstract

We quantitatively study the probability distribution function (PDF) of cosmological nonlinear density fluctuations from N -body simulations with a Gaussian initial condition. In particular, we examine the validity and limitations of one-point and two-point lognormal PDF models against those directly estimated from the simulations. We find that the one-point lognormal PDF very accurately describes the cosmological density distribution even in the nonlinear regime (rms variance σ nl ≲ 4, overdensity δ ≲ 100). Furthermore, the two-point lognormal PDFs are also in good agreement with the simulation data from linear to fairly nonlinear regimes, while they deviate slightly from the simulation data for δ ≲ -0.5. Thus, the lognormal PDF can be used as a useful empirical model for the cosmological density fluctuations. While this conclusion is fairly insensitive to the shape of the underlying power spectrum of density fluctuations P ( k ), models with substantial power on large scales, i.e., n ≡ d ln P ( k )/ d ln k ≲ -1, are better described by the lognormal PDF. On the other hand, we note that the one-to-one mapping of the initial and evolved density fields, consistent with the lognormal model, does not approximate the broad distribution of their mutual correlation even on average. Thus, the origin of the phenomenological lognormal PDF approximation still remains to be understood.

Cited by