2001/02/15 by Eric P. Rubenstein
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Scientific Research and Discoveries #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1086/321091
11 pages, 2 figures, accepted by the Astronomical Journal (scheduled June 2001)
arxiv created 2001/02/15 · openalex publication_date 2001/06/01 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Field W Ursae Majoris binaries observe a well-known period-color relation such that systems containing more massive stars are bluer and have longer orbital periods than systems with lower mass components. However, it has been known for a decade that metal-poor W Ursae Majoris binaries are too blue, have too short an orbital period, or both. Correcting the observed color for the reduced line blanketing in the atmosphere of a Population II star accounts for only part of the observed discrepancy. As others have suggested and Rucinski recently showed, the smaller radii of Population II stars and the correspondingly shorter orbital periods are responsible for the remainder. In this paper I investigate the effect of evolution on the location in the period-color plane. This paper addresses the restricted case of equal-mass components in critical contact with their inner Roche lobes but should be applicable to the more general cases to the extent that the relative sizes of stellar components are preserved with metallicity changes. The calculated metallicity-age dependent period-color relations substantially agree with Rucinski & Duerbeck's recent empirically derived corrections to the period-color relation over most of the investigated range of periods. However, our predictions deviate to a greater degree as stellar age increases, since their parameterization does not include the effect of evolution.