vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Energy conservation for point particles undergoing radiation reaction

1999/03/04 by Theodore C. Quinn, Robert M. Wald · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #gr-qc

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.064009

published as Phys.Rev. D60 (1999) 064009 · 34 pages, 1 PostScript figure, uses RevTeX 3.1, submitted to PRD

arxiv created 1999/03/04 · arxiv updated 2009/11/30

Abstract

For smooth solutions to Maxwell's equations sourced by a smooth charge-current distribution ja in stationary, asymptotically flat spacetimes, one can prove an energy conservation theorem which asserts the vanishing of the sum of (i) the difference between the final and initial electromagnetic self-energy of the charge distribution, (ii) the net electromagnetic energy radiated to infinity (and/or into a black hole/white hole), and (iii) the total work done by the electromagnetic field on the charge distribution via the Lorentz force. A similar conservation theorem can be proven for linearized gravitational fields off of a stationary, asymptotically flat background, with the second order Einstein tensor playing the role of an effective stress-energy tensor of the linearized field. In this paper, we prove the above theorems for smooth sources and then investigate the extent to which they continue to hold for point particle sources. The ``self-energy'' of point particles is ill defined, but in the electromagnetic case, we can consider situations where, initially and finally, the point charges are stationary and in the same spatial position, so that the self-energy terms should cancel. Under certain assumptions concerning the decay behavior of source-free solutions to Maxwell's equations, we prove the vanishing of the sum of the net energy radiated to infinity and the net work done on the particle by the DeWitt-Brehme radiation reaction force. We also obtain a similar conservation theorem for angular momentum in an axisymmetric spacetime. In the gravitational case, we argue that similar conservation results should hold for freely falling point masses whose orbits begin and end at infinity.

Cited by