1999/04/30 by Peter Coles, Adrian L. Melott, Adrian Melott +2 · 1 citation
Environmental Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Remote Sensing in Agriculture #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1086/312174
Latex, accepted for publication in ApJL; moderate revisions
arxiv created 1999/06/11 · openalex publication_date 1999/08/10 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
It is now well established that galaxies are biased tracers of the distribution of matter, although it is still not known what form this bias takes. In local bias models, the propensity for a galaxy to form at a point depends only on the overall density of matter at that point. Hierarchical scaling arguments allow one to build a fully specified model of the underlying distribution of matter and to explore the effects of local bias in the regime of strong clustering. Using a generating function method developed by Bernardeau & Schaeffer, we show that hierarchical models lead one directly to the conclusion that a local bias does not alter the shape of the galaxy correlation function relative to the matter correlation function on large scales. This provides an elegant extension of a result first obtained by Coles for Gaussian underlying fields and confirms the conclusions of Scherrer & Weinberg obtained using a different approach. We also argue that particularly dense regions in a hierarchical density field display a form of bias that is different from that obtained by selecting such peaks in Gaussian fields: they are themselves hierarchically distributed with scaling parameters S p = p ( p -2) . This kind of bias is also factorizable, thus in principle furnishing a simple test of this class of models.