2016/04/19 by Nicole Martins, Mona Malacane, Nicky Lewis +1 · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Media Influence and Health #Gender, Feminism, and Media #Child Development and Digital Technology
paper · doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1089465
openalex publication_date 2016/04/19 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
A content analysis of the MTV shows 16 and Pregnant (n = 59), Teen Mom (n = 20), and Teen Mom 2 (n = 20) was conducted to determine whether these programs accurately portray teen pregnancy. The results revealed that teen mothers on 16 and Pregnant were younger, more often White, and had more healthy babies as compared to national averages. The babies' fathers were more involved in the daily care of their child as compared to reality. Medical insurance or receipt of government assistance was almost never discussed. Teen mothers in the Teen Mom shows were significantly more likely to achieve a high school diploma as compared to reality. Finally, mothers on Teen Mom and Teen Mom 2 were significantly less likely to voice concern about finances and had more active social lives than mothers on 16 and Pregnant. Using social learning theory as a theoretical framework, we argue that these shows provide mixed messages to young audiences about teen pregnancy and parenthood.