1997/10/21 by M. Kunzli, M. Künzli, P. North · 1 citation
Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Astrophysics #Giant star #K-type main-sequence star #Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics #Photometry (optics) #Physics #Red giant #Stars #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #T Tauri star #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1051/aas:1998350
19 pages, 13 figures, to appear in A&AS
arxiv created 1997/10/21 · openalex publication_date 1998/01/01 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We test the hypothesis of Berthet (1992) which foresees that Am stars become giant metallic A and F stars (defined by an enhanced value of the blanketing parameter of the Geneva photometry) when they evolve. If this hypothesis is right, Am and metallic A-FIII stars need to have the same rate of binaries and a similar distribution of . From our new spectroscopic data and from and radial velocities in the literature, we show that it is not the case. The metallic giant stars are often fast rotators with larger than 100 km s-1, while the maximum rotational velocity for Am stars is about 100 km s-1. The rate of tight binaries with periods less than 1000 days is less than 30% among metallic giants, which is incompatible with the value of 75% for Am stars (Abt & Levy 1985). Therefore, the simplest way to explain the existence of giant metallic F stars is to suggest that all normal A and early F stars might go through a short "metallic" phase when they are finishing their life on the main sequence. Besides, it is shown that only giant stars with spectral type comprised between F0 and F6 may have a really enhanced value, while all A-type giants seem to be normal.