vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Inverse neutrinoless doubleβdecay reexamined

1995/08/17 by G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, David London +3 · 6 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Neutrino Physics Research #Particle Detector Development and Performance #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #hep-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.6292

published as Phys.Rev. D53 (1996) 6292-6301 · paper in LATEX, 24 pages, 10 figures in separate uuencoded psfile. Complete psfile available via anonymous ftp at ftp://lapphp0.in2p3.fr/pub/preprints-theorie/doublebeta.uu or via www at http://lapphp0.in2p3.fr/preplapp/psth/doublebeta.ps.gz

arxiv created 1995/08/17 · openalex publication_date 1996/06/01 · arxiv updated 2009/11/30 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We critically reexamine the prospects for the observation of the \ensuremathΔL=2 lepton-number-violating process e^\ensuremath-e^\ensuremath-\ensuremath→W^\ensuremath-W^\ensuremath- using the e^\ensuremath-e^\ensuremath- option of a high-energy e+e^\ensuremath- collider (NLC). We find that, except in the most contrived scenarios, constraints from neutrinoless double \ensuremathβ decay render the process unobservable at an NLC of √(s)<2 TeV. Other \ensuremathΔL=2 processes such as \ensuremathγ\ensuremathγ\ensuremath→\ensuremathℓ+\ensuremathℓ+W^\ensuremath-W^\ensuremath-, e^\ensuremath-\ensuremathγ\ensuremath→\ensuremathνe\ensuremathℓ^\ensuremath-\ensuremathℓ^\ensuremath-W+, e^\ensuremath-e^\ensuremath-\ensuremath→\ensuremathνe\ensuremathνe\ensuremathℓ^\ensuremath-\ensuremathℓ^\ensuremath-(\ensuremathℓ=\ensuremathμ, \ensuremathτ), and e^\ensuremath-\ensuremathγ\ensuremath→e+W^\ensuremath-W^\ensuremath-, which use various options of the NLC, require a √(s) of at least 4 TeV for observability.

Cited by