1993/08/20 by Leonard Susskind, L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius +1 · 4 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy #Black Holes and Theoretical Physics #Black hole (networking) #Black hole complementarity #Classical mechanics #Complementarity (molecular biology) #Computer science #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Event horizon #Extremal black hole #Fuzzball #Hawking #Hawking radiation #Horizon #Micro black hole #Naked singularity #Physics #Planck #Planck scale #Quantum #Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect #Quantum gravity #Quantum mechanics #Spacetime #Theoretical physics #hep-th
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.966
published as Phys.Rev.D49:966-974,1994 · 22 pages (including 7 figures), SU-ITP-93-19
arxiv created 1993/08/20 · openalex publication_date 1994/01/15 · arxiv updated 2009/11/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Analysis of several gedanken experiments indicates that black hole complementarity cannot be ruled out on the basis of known physical principles. Experiments designed by outside observers to disprove the existence of a quantum-mechanical stretched horizon require knowledge of Planck-scale effects for their analysis. Observers who fall through the event horizon after sampling the Hawking radiation cannot discover duplicate information inside the black hole before hitting the singularity. Experiments by outside observers to detect baryon number violation will yield significant effects well outside the stretched horizon.