The trouble with radicalization
2013/07/01 by PETER R. NEUMANN, Peter R. Neumann · 19 citations
Social Sciences · #Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence #Political Conflict and Governance #Islamic Studies and Radicalism
paper · doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12049
Abstract
Though widely used by academics and policymakers in the context of the “War on Terror”, the concept of radicalisation lacks clarity. As this article will show, radicalization is not a myth, but its meaning is ambiguous, and the major controversies and debates that have sprung from it are linked to the same, inherent ambiguity. The principal conceptual fault line is between notions of radicalization that emphasize extremist beliefs (“cognitive radicalization”) and those that focus on extremist behavior (“behavioral radicalization”). This ambiguity explains the differences between definitions of radicalization; it has driven the scholarly debate, which has revolved around the relationship between cognition and behavior; and it provides the backdrop for strikingly different policy approaches – loosely labeled “European” and “Anglo-Saxon” which the article delineates and discusses in depth. Rather than denying its validity, the article calls on scholars and policymakers to work harder to understand and embrace a concept which – though ambiguous – is likely to dominate research and policy agendas for years to come.
Cited by
- The Growth of the Anti-Transgender Movement in the United Kingdom. The Silent Radicalization of the British Electorate
- Online Radicalisation: Moving Beyond a Simple Dichotomy
- From Envy to Radicalization
- Reliability and Validity of Risk Assessment Tools for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review
- Coalitions and Characters: Tracing the Maturity of Sweden's Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism Policies
- Radicalization and the internet: 25 years of (online) radicalization research
- Toward a Constructivist Model of Radicalization and Deradicalization: A Conceptual and Methodological Proposal. [europepmc]
- Vulnerability to Ideologically-Motivated Violence Among Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder. [europepmc]
- Multi-Ideology, Multiclass Online Extremism Dataset, and Its Evaluation Using Machine Learning. [europepmc]
- PROTOCOL: Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence: A systematic review of tools and approaches. [europepmc]
- Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family-related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization. [europepmc]
- PROTOCOL: Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family-related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization. [europepmc]
- From Envy to Radicalization. [europepmc]
- Case management interventions seeking to counter radicalisation to violence and related forms of violence: A systematic review. [europepmc]
- Towards a fruitful concept of radicalisation: a synthesis. [europepmc]
- PROTOCOL: Non-criminal justice interventions for countering cognitive and behavioural radicalisation amongst children and adolescents: A systematic review of effectiveness and implementation. [europepmc]
- PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of Educational Programmes to Prevent and Counter Online Violent Extremist Propaganda in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, German and Scandinavian Language Studies: A Systematic Review. [europepmc]
- Reliability and Validity of Risk Assessment Tools for Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review. [europepmc]
- PROTOCOL: Primary Interventions for Preventing Cognitive and Behavioral Radicalization: An Evidence and Gap Map. [europepmc]
Related