vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Spontaneous Lorentz violation: Non-Abelian gauge fields as pseudo-Goldstone vector bosons

2007/04/30 by J.L. Chkareuli, J. L. Chkareuli, J. Jejelava +1
Physics and Astronomy · #Black Holes and Theoretical Physics #Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #hep-ph #hep-th

paper · pdf · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.073

published as Phys.Lett.B659:754-760,2008 · Invited talk given at Caucasian-German School and Workshop in Hadron Physics (4-7 September 2006, Tbilisi, Georgia)

arxiv created 2007/09/15 · openalex publication_date 2007/12/05 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

We argue that non-Abelian gauge fields can be treated as the pseudo-Goldstone vector bosons caused by spontaneous Lorentz invariance violation (SLIV). To this end, the SLIV which evolves in a general Yang–Mills type theory with the nonlinear vector field constraint Tr(AμAμ)=±M2 (M is a proposed SLIV scale) imposed is considered in detail. Specifically, we show that in a theory with an internal symmetry group G having D generators not only the pure Lorentz symmetry SO(1,3), but the larger accidental symmetry SO(D,3D) of the SLIV constraint in itself appears to be spontaneously broken as well. As a result, although the pure Lorentz violation on its own still generates only one genuine Goldstone vector boson, the accompanying pseudo-Goldstone vector bosons related to the SO(D,3D) breaking also come into play properly completing the whole gauge multiplet of the internal symmetry group G taken. Remarkably, they appear to be strictly massless as well, being protected by the starting non-Abelian gauge invariance of the Yang–Mills theory involved. When expressed in terms of the pure Goldstone vector modes, this theory look essentially nonlinear and contains a plethora of Lorentz and CPT violating couplings. However, they do not lead to physical SLIV effects which turn out to be strictly cancelled in all the lowest order processes considered.

Citations