2014/05/01 by David Neumark, J. M. Ian Salas, William Wascher · 13 citations
Health Professions · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #Employment and Welfare Studies #Labor market dynamics and wage inequality #Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
paper · doi:10.1177/00197939140670s307
The authors revisit the long-running minimum wage–employment debate to assess new studies claiming that estimates produced by the panel data approach commonly used in recent minimum wage research are flawed by that approach's failure to account for spatial heterogeneity. The new studies use research designs intended to control for this heterogeneity and conclude that minimum wages in the United States have not reduced employment. The authors explore the ability of the new research designs to isolate reliable identifying information, and they test the designs' untested assumptions about the construction of better control groups. Their analysis reveals problems with the new research designs. Moreover, using methods that let the data identify the appropriate control groups, their results reaffirm the evidence of disemployment effects, with teen employment elasticities near −0.15. This evidence, they conclude, still shows that minimum wages pose a tradeoff of higher wages for some against job losses for others.