2007/05/31 by F. Intravaia, A. Lambrecht
Physics and Astronomy · #Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect #Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics #Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques #quant-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/s11080-007-9044-4
published as Open Sys. & information Dyn. 14, 159 (2007) · 10 pages, 3 figures. TQMFA2005
openalex publication_date 2007/05/31 · arxiv created 2007/11/05 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In this paper, we study the role of surface plasmon modes in the Casimir effect. First we write the Casimir energy as the sum over the modes of a real cavity. We may identify two sorts of modes, two evanescent surface plasmon modes and propagative modes. As one of the surface plasmon modes becomes propagative for some choice of parameters we adopt an adiabatic mode definition where we follow this mode into the propagative sector and count it together with the surface plasmon contribution, calling this contribution “plasmonic”. The remaining modes are propagative cavity modes, which we call “photonic”. The Casimir energy contains two main contributions, one coming from the plasmonic, the other from the photonic modes. Surprisingly we find that the plasmonic contribution to the Casimir energy becomes repulsive for intermediate and large mirror separations. Alternatively, we discuss the common surface plasmon defintion, which includes only evanescent waves, where this effect is not found. We show that, in contrast to an intuitive expectation, for both definitions the Casimir energy is the sum of two very large contributions which nearly cancel each other. The contribution of surface plasmons to the Casimir energy plays a fundamental role not only at short but also at large distances.