2007/06/30 by Mauro Mobilia, M. Mobilia, Alexander M. Petersen +2 · 3 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Physics and Astronomy · #Complex Network Analysis Techniques #Diffusion and Search Dynamics #Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence #cond-mat.stat-mech #physics.gen-ph #physics.soc-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2007/08/p08029
published as J. Stat. Mech. P08029, (2007) · 9 pages, 7 figures, 2-column revtex4 format. Revision has a figure added and minor changes in response to referee comments. For publication in JSTAT
openalex publication_date 2007/08/01 · arxiv created 2007/08/02 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
We study the voter model with a finite density of zealots—voters that never change opinion. For equal numbers of zealots of each species, the distribution of magnetization (opinions) is Gaussian in the mean-field limit, as well as in one and two dimensions, with a width that is proportional to , where Z is the number of zealots, independent of the total number of voters. Thus just a few zealots can prevent consensus or even the formation of a robust majority.