2009/06/26 by Daniel Barben · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Environmental Science · Psychology · #Climate Change Communication and Perception #Environmental Education and Sustainability #Animal and Plant Science Education
paper · doi:10.1177/0963662509335459
openalex publication_date 2009/06/26 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
Reviewing the main research approaches on the acceptance of science and technology (S&T) developed in the last decades, I will (1) summarize advances achieved and persisting problems concerning the understanding of both the public and S&T. I will show that the acceptance-centered framework has, at least implicitly, been linked to practical efforts in acceptance politics, i.e., attempts to improve a lack of acceptance. In order to investigate conflicts relating to S&T in a more reflective way, I will (2) suggest an epistemological shift towards the analysis of acceptance politics. Building on the distinction between the relevance and resonance of S&T, the ways in which S&T are valuated and gain legitimacy are investigated from a regime analytical perspective. I will (3) exemplify the advantages of this approach by comparatively analyzing the acceptance politics of three biotechnology applications in the USA and Germany. I will (4) conclude with an outlook on future research.