vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Did nature also choose arsenic?

2009/01/30 by Felisa Wolfe‐Simon, Paul Davies, Ariel D. Anbar · 1 citation
Environmental Science · #Arsenic contamination and mitigation #Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact #Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

paper · doi:10.1017/s1473550408004394

openalex publication_date 2009/01/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21

Abstract

Abstract All known life requires phosphorus (P) in the form of inorganic phosphate (PO 4 3− or P i ) and phosphate-containing organic molecules. P i serves as the backbone of the nucleic acids that constitute genetic material and as the major repository of chemical energy for metabolism in polyphosphate bonds. Arsenic (As) lies directly below P on the periodic table and so the two elements share many chemical properties, although their chemistries are sufficiently dissimilar that As cannot directly replace P in modern biochemistry. Arsenic is toxic because As and P are similar enough that organisms attempt this substitution. We hypothesize that ancient biochemical systems, analogous to but distinct from those known today, could have utilized arsenate in the equivalent biological role as phosphate. Organisms utilizing such ‘weird life’ biochemical pathways may have supported a ‘shadow biosphere’ at the time of the origin and early evolution of life on Earth or on other planets. Such organisms may even persist on Earth today, undetected, in unusual niches.

Citations

Cited by