Reliable Post-Retrieval Assembly for Agent Memory: Separating Evidence Extraction from Policy Execution

2026/06/30 by Vikas Reddy, Sumanth Reddy Challaram
Computer Science · #cs.AI #cs.CL #cs.IR

paper · pdf

11 pages, 5 tables. Accepted as a poster at the Lifelong Agent Workshop at COLM 2026. Code: https://github.com/cvikasreddy/memory-conflict-resolution

arxiv created 2026/08/02 · arxiv updated 2026/08/04

Abstract

LLM-based memory systems can retrieve relevant evidence yet still fail when answer generation entangles semantic filtering, conflict resolution, prior suppression, and output generation in one step. We study this failure as a problem of post-retrieval assembly. In the MemoryAgentBench (MAB) release used here, FactConsolidation explicitly states that newer facts have larger serial numbers, yet the best reported retrieval/memory result is 54% single-hop and all 22 reported systems score at most 7% multi-hop. We evaluate a structured assembly interface in which an LLM first extracts semantically matching evidence into a candidate representation and a separate stage executes the required answer policy. At 262K, this pipeline reaches 82%/93% single-hop and 27%/41% multi-hop with gpt-4o-mini/gpt-4o, exceeding every result reported in the MAB v3 FactConsolidation comparison. This is a task-level result, not a claim that the evaluated memory architectures are broadly inferior. A controlled whole-pipeline comparison, with identical backbone, retrieved top-10 evidence, chunking, and n=100 per cell, improves single-hop accuracy by 10.8 percentage points (pp) on average and 21 pp at 262K. A targeted comparison using the same extraction setup shows that changing only the final policy executor contributes 2.0 pp on average and 0 pp at 262K. Most of the gain therefore comes from separating evidence identification from final policy execution rather than from the freshness operator itself. A LongMemEval check finds no significant overall advantage (26/45 versus 29/45; paired exact McNemar p=0.45), bounding the result to current-value questions with explicit version metadata. The evidence identifies post-retrieval assembly as a distinct reliability boundary between retrieval and answer generation.

Citations

• TruthfulRAG: Resolving Factual-level Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Knowledge Graphs
• Solving Freshness in RAG: A Simple Recency Prior and the Limits of Heuristic Trend Detection
• MAGIC: A Multi-Hop and Graph-Based Benchmark for Inter-Context Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions
• Question Answering under Temporal Conflict: Evaluating and Organizing Evolving Knowledge with LLMs
• Micro-Act: Mitigating Knowledge Conflict in LLM-based RAG via Actionable Self-Reasoning
• Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory
• From RAG to Memory: Non-Parametric Continual Learning for Large Language Models
• Zep: A Temporal Knowledge Graph Architecture for Agent Memory
• LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memory
• Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing
• Adaptive Token Biaser: Knowledge Editing via Biasing Key Entities
• Unveiling Divergent Inductive Biases of LLMs on Temporal Data
• MultiHop-RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Queries
• MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems
• RECOMP: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LMs with Compression and Selective Augmentation
• Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergy
• Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
• Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questions
• Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models
• Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Tasks
• Selection-Inference: Exploiting Large Language Models for Interpretable Logical Reasoning